I try to remember it was more than twenty years ago when my sophisticated friend described that 'the results Heisenberg calculated for the certain values were, about 10 000 times too high'.
Or, Born gave him the x 10 000 wrong values?
The article from Wikipedia don't offer better data or information regarding that episode, right?
Afterwards, Born might had the emotions concerning under pressure for his knowledge during the conversation and when escaped a bit later via Sweden by utilizing specific aeroplane...🇸🇪
The memes or the terms do spread (the cross-section*), I think, from the value drivers of the fields in physics or philosophy toward the arts, such as music or poetry or the clothing vogues, the way the monsters can't copy or imitate or absorb influences (monsters don't fancy the cabarees or the pub concerts) for the purpose to create new, hopefully masterpieces in the sense for the commercialism.
I have tried to study how the beginning of quantum era influenced to painted arts: competerized music is much easier to present.
Today I copied, for example, the word morphe (but we don't have the Finnish translation for the concept of morphing, yet) from Mark Knofpler's Instagram post.
The cross-section means 'the sphere, field, area, space, sector, scope or line of influence in Finnish language.
But when dealing with physics the correct term is called cross-section (=vaikutusala; vaikutus [influence] + ala [field]) after Wikipedia.
These are real life, natural interactiin consepts:
- need to say no, someday, to happiness pump (also when relationship unfair or love unhappy).
- Price of fairness, I argue, can be calculated after the trading and after the better price signals. Any comments?
- How could the superintelligence machines calculate or know the all-the-time diversed and constantly variable needs by the multible, developing Individuals with the creative vogues: for the genes of joy and happiness, natural selection with the pure emotions...
But - to be warned - when dealing with the monsters such as dictorships or monopolies there exist several serious dangers.
First, it is not easy to trade with those at all: there may be hidden 'unethical norms' during the selling phase or entry chain, ruled by those who dictate the system naturally.
After the relationship is created, the cooperation can utililze both parties well, just like during the Cold war for example, when the Finnish enterprices traded with Soviet Union. But when the unnatural system collapsed, the economical destructuction caused widespred depression lasting for years (but Nokia and IT boom saved us)
Yesterday for instance, more than 30 years after the official conspiracy (con + spriral, Finnish 'common spririt', 'secret pact') called YYA - collapsed, the information regarding the money laundry of dirty Russian capital by utilizing the well branded Finnish banks, emerged for me as new information.
The official govermential institution(s) supervising the banks were also corrupted.
The final sentences from the text opens in the windows created by John Nash who improved the theories by Adam Smith: individuals will gain better result when thinking about both the best for the group (or organization) but also - just like Smith argued - personal interests of individuals.
Pareto's 80/20 rule regarding the spread of the wealthy in society, have been videly misinterpreted here in Finland: just like, for examble, the case of non-free-will - that is appropriate some kind of deterministic biological law of the nature among the (hard working) people - just obey and follow the (political) leaders. Or as a reason the justify certain taxing policies...
I try to remember it was more than twenty years ago when my sophisticated friend described that 'the results Heisenberg calculated for the certain values were, about 10 000 times too high'.
Or, Born gave him the x 10 000 wrong values?
The article from Wikipedia don't offer better data or information regarding that episode, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_(play)
Afterwards, Born might had the emotions concerning under pressure for his knowledge during the conversation and when escaped a bit later via Sweden by utilizing specific aeroplane...🇸🇪
After the short reconsiderations...
The memes or the terms do spread (the cross-section*), I think, from the value drivers of the fields in physics or philosophy toward the arts, such as music or poetry or the clothing vogues, the way the monsters can't copy or imitate or absorb influences (monsters don't fancy the cabarees or the pub concerts) for the purpose to create new, hopefully masterpieces in the sense for the commercialism.
I have tried to study how the beginning of quantum era influenced to painted arts: competerized music is much easier to present.
Today I copied, for example, the word morphe (but we don't have the Finnish translation for the concept of morphing, yet) from Mark Knofpler's Instagram post.
The cross-section means 'the sphere, field, area, space, sector, scope or line of influence in Finnish language.
But when dealing with physics the correct term is called cross-section (=vaikutusala; vaikutus [influence] + ala [field]) after Wikipedia.
https://youtu.be/BcJ1q0c1F4g
These are real life, natural interactiin consepts:
- need to say no, someday, to happiness pump (also when relationship unfair or love unhappy).
- Price of fairness, I argue, can be calculated after the trading and after the better price signals. Any comments?
- How could the superintelligence machines calculate or know the all-the-time diversed and constantly variable needs by the multible, developing Individuals with the creative vogues: for the genes of joy and happiness, natural selection with the pure emotions...
But - to be warned - when dealing with the monsters such as dictorships or monopolies there exist several serious dangers.
First, it is not easy to trade with those at all: there may be hidden 'unethical norms' during the selling phase or entry chain, ruled by those who dictate the system naturally.
After the relationship is created, the cooperation can utililze both parties well, just like during the Cold war for example, when the Finnish enterprices traded with Soviet Union. But when the unnatural system collapsed, the economical destructuction caused widespred depression lasting for years (but Nokia and IT boom saved us)
Yesterday for instance, more than 30 years after the official conspiracy (con + spriral, Finnish 'common spririt', 'secret pact') called YYA - collapsed, the information regarding the money laundry of dirty Russian capital by utilizing the well branded Finnish banks, emerged for me as new information.
The official govermential institution(s) supervising the banks were also corrupted.
The final sentences from the text opens in the windows created by John Nash who improved the theories by Adam Smith: individuals will gain better result when thinking about both the best for the group (or organization) but also - just like Smith argued - personal interests of individuals.
Pareto's 80/20 rule regarding the spread of the wealthy in society, have been videly misinterpreted here in Finland: just like, for examble, the case of non-free-will - that is appropriate some kind of deterministic biological law of the nature among the (hard working) people - just obey and follow the (political) leaders. Or as a reason the justify certain taxing policies...